⿻ SONAR

|OVERVIEW|SITREP|PRODUCTS|S&T|FEED|
|UPDATED: 30 July 2025
SONAR (Sound Navigation and Ranging) is the primary sensing modality for navigating, detecting, and identifying objects in the underwater domain. It allows crewed and uncrewed platforms to localize threats and terrain features on the surface, within the water column, and along the seabed. SONAR operates in two primary modes: passive and active.
PASSIVE SONAR
Passive sonar detects and analyzes underwater acoustic signals by listening to sound waves in the environment. Unlike active sonar, which transmits acoustic waves and analyzes their reflections, passive sonar is entirely reliant on detecting sounds generated by external sources.
Passive sonar utilizes underwater listening devices to monitor underwater sound waves emitted from sound sources such as machinery noise from ships and submarines, propeller cavitation, flow noise caused by water movement, fish/mammal sounds, or seismic noise made by underwater landslides or earthquakes. Sound wave data are processed into information, which can then be used to classify the type of sound (ship, biologic), and often can identify the sound (fishing trawler, submarine, shrimp). Depending on the sophistication and number of listening devices, the relative position of the sound can be calculated (localized). Passive sonar is used by navies worldwide to track submarines, and provides a tactical advantage to the user as it emits no signatures (sound or otherwise), making it inherently stealthy. However, given the complexity of the underwater domain, which affects how sounds travels, passive sonar cannot provide range information, unless using target motion analysis (TMA).
KEY COMPONENTS:
▶︎ Hydrophones – Underwater microphones that capture acoustic energy, deployed in various configurations:
- Individually or as part of linear, planar, or volumetric arrays.
- On platforms such as surface ships, submarines, seabed stations, sonobuoys, or autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs).
- Hydrophone arrays enable beamforming, bearing estimation, and localization of sound sources.
▶︎ Signal Processing Systems – Amplify, filter, and digitize incoming acoustic signals via:
- Noise reduction (to suppress ambient and self-noise),
- Frequency analysis (FFT, spectrograms),
- Beamforming (to resolve bearing),
- Classification algorithms to identify signal types or match known acoustic profiles.
▶︎ Databases and Libraries – Core elements of passive sonar performance.
- Acoustic signature databases containing spectral and temporal profiles of known underwater sound sources (ship, submarine, biologic, seismic).
- Environmental models to support propagation loss estimation and improve classification accuracy.
- Libraries may be updated in real time via networked intelligence sources or offline mission planning tools.
▶︎ Display Interface / Analysis Console – Used by sonar operators to visualize acoustic data in formats.
- Waterfall displays, bearing-time records (BTRs), or spectrum analyzers.
- Interfaces enable manual validation, target tracking, and intelligence gathering.
▶︎ Navigation and Timing Systems – Precision time synchronization is essential for:
- Multistatic passive arrays
- Distributed undersea sensor networks
- Target motion analysis (TMA) when localizing/tracking contacts.
▶︎ Acoustic Data Recorders / Loggers – Store raw acoustic data for post-mission review and analysis.
APPLICATIONS:
- Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) - Detecting, locating, and tracking submarines and other subsurface threats based on acoustic emissions.
- Underwater Surveillance - Monitoring specific regions for underwater activity.
- Marine Scientific Research - Studying marine life and underwater environments.
- Seismic Monitoring - Detecting underwater earthquakes, landslides, or other geological activity.
- Environmental Monitoring - Monitoring noise pollution and its effects on marine ecosystems.
ADVANTAGES:
- Stealth -Passive sonar does not emit acoustic energy, making it difficult to detect by adversaries.
- Long Range - Depending on environmental conditions and sound source, passive sonar can detect sound over significant distances.
- Energy Efficiency - Since it does not involve active emission, it requires less energy, making it suitable for long-duration deployments with underwater sensors or AUVs.
LIMITATIONS:
- Background Noise - Natural (waves, marine life) and human-made noise can interfere with detection and classification.
- Signal Interpretation - Differentiating between similar acoustic signatures can be difficult, and requires skilled operators and advanced algorithms for accurate analysis.
Dependence on Target Noise - If the target is using noise-reduction technologies, it becomes harder to detect.
ADVANCEMENTS:
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) - AI-driven algorithms improve signal processing, classification, and real-time decision-making.
- Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) - Uses "dark" fibers housed within subsea cables as distributed hydrophones, enabling large-scale, real-time passive acoustic monitoring. (See DAS Briefing Book)
- Networking - Integrating multiple passive sonar systems into a wide-area network enhances coverage and accuracy.
ACTIVE SONAR
Unlike passive sonar, which only listens, active sonar involves transmitting sound waves and analyzing their reflections (echoes) from targets. It is widely used in both military and civilian applications for its ability to provide precise range, bearing, and, in some cases, velocity information about underwater objects. By measuring the time it takes for the sound to return, the system can estimate the distance to a target, while the direction of the returned signal determines the object's bearing.
KEY COMPONENTS:
▶︎ Transmitter – Generates and emits acoustic energy (signals) into the water using a projector or transducer.
- Low-frequency signals are typicall used for long-range target detection, such as submarines
- Mid-frequency signals for balanced range/resolution (ASW, obstacle avoidance)
- High-frequency signals are used for high-resolution imaging (minehunting, navigation).
- Transmitters may use single-tone pulses, chirps (frequency sweeps), or coded waveforms for enhanced performance.
▶︎ Receiver - Captures echoes returning from underwater objects using hydrophones or transducer arrays, and may be:
- Monostatic (a shared transmitter/receiver)
- Bistatic/multistatic (transmitter and receiver at separate locations).
- Arrays may be fixed, towed, or conformal to the hull or uncrewed underwater vehicle body.
▶︎ Signal Processing System – Amplifies, filters, and digitizes incoming echoes.
- Determines range, bearing, velocity (via Doppler Effect), and sometimes target strength.
- Performs beamforming (for directional resolution).
- Applies pulse compression (for resolution enhancement).
- Reduces reverberation and ambient noise.
- Supports target classification using matched filtering or AI-enhanced techniques.
▶︎ Display Interface / Console – Presents processed data to operators.
- 2D waterfall plots or polar displays (for tracking)
- 3D bathymetric maps (in survey systems)
- Real-time imaging (for diver nav or object recognition)
APPLICATIONS:
- Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) - Detecting and tracking submarines.
- Mine Detection - Identifying underwater mines in littoral or deep-sea environments.
- Subsea Inspection/Security - Monitoring critical underwater infrastructure, ports, and harbors.
- Torpedo Guidance - To close on targets during terminal homing.
- Hydrographic Surveying - Mapping the seafloor and underwater features.
- Navigation - Assisting ships and submarines in navigating shallow or obstacle-rich waters.
- Search and Rescue - Locating sunken vessels, aircraft, or lost objects underwater.
- Marine Research - Studying underwater habitats and marine life.
ADVANTAGES:
- Precision - Provides accurate range and bearing data, and is useful for imaging and detailed mapping of underwater objects.
- Independent of Sound Source - Unlike passive sonar, active sonar does not rely on the target generating noise, making it effective against quiet or stationary objects.
- All-Weather Operation - Effective in various environmental conditions, though performance may vary based on factors like salinity, temperature, and depth.
LIMITATIONS:
- Detectability - The emission of acoustic signals can reveal the position of the sonar source, undermining stealth in military operations.
- Environmental Interference - Reflections from the seafloor, surface, and other objects can create false echoes or clutter. Performance is affected by sound propagation characteristics, including temperature layers, salinity gradients, and underwater currents.
- Impact on Marine Life - High-intensity sound waves can disturb or harm marine animals, leading to environmental concerns and regulatory restrictions in some areas.
DEPLOYMENT CONFIGURATIONS:
- Hull-Mounted Sonar – Installed directly on the hull of surface ships or submarines, and used for general detection, navigation, obstacle avoidance, and ASW, typically in the medium- to low-frequency range depending on the mission.
- Towed Array Sonar (Active/Passive) – A long array of transducers and/or hydrophones towed behind a ship or AUV. Active towed arrays are less common than passive but can provide enhanced detection in deeper waters with better isolation from ship noise. Used in ASW and wide-area surveillance.
- Variable Depth Sonar (VDS) – A type of towed sonar where the transducer can be raised or lowered to different depths, allowing operators to bypass thermal layers and optimize sonar performance.
- Sonobuoys (Active/Passive) – Expendable sonar systems dropped by aircraft or helicopters. Active sonobuoys emit pings and listen for echoes to detect submarines in a defined area. Common in ASW operations.
- Diver-Held Sonar – Compact, portable sonar units used for close-range navigation, object detection, or mine clearance in diver operations.
- Mounted Sonar – Active sonar mounted on unmanned platforms or tow bodies, often used for minehunting, navigation, or inspection. May include imaging systems like side-scan, multibeam, or synthetic aperture sonar (SAS).
ADVANCEMENTS:
- Low-Probability-of-Intercept (LPI) - Some advanced active sonar systems employ low-power, frequency-agile signals to minimize detectability while maintaining active sensing capabilities. (See SITREP.)
- High-Resolution Imaging - Advances in signal processing enable highly detailed images of underwater targets.
- Autonomous Systems - Integration into uncrewed maritime systems enables independent operations.
- Advanced Waveforms - Use of complex signals like chirps for enhanced target resolution and reduced interference.
▶︎ POSITIONING AND NAVIGATION:
Navigational sonar is a type of active sonar system specifically designed to assist vessels and underwater vehicles in safely navigating their environments. Unlike sonar used for detection or tracking, navigational sonar focuses on providing detailed information about the underwater terrain, obstacles, and other potential hazards to ensure safe passage. Navigational sonar is often fused with inertial navigation systems (INS), Doppler velocity logs (DVL), and occasional GPS fixes to improve accuracy in GPS-denied environments.
APPLICATIONS
- Maritime Navigation - Ensures safe passage for ships in shallow or cluttered waters by helping to avoid underwater hazards, especially in ports or coastal areas.
- Submarine Navigation - Crucial for navigating submerged environments, such as narrow channels or ice-covered regions. Prevents collisions with underwater structures or other submarines.
- AUV and ROV Operations - Aids in semi or fully autonomous navigation of underwater vehicles for research, exploration, and maintenance tasks.
- Search and Rescue - Supports operations in finding sunken vessels, aircraft, or lost objects.
- Seafloor Mapping - Used in hydrographic surveys to create detailed maps of underwater topography. Technologies such as synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) require precise vehicle positioning and navigation to coherently combine multiple acoustic pings, enabling the generation of ultra-high-resolution imagery over broad swaths of the seafloor.
TYPES:
- Forward-Looking Sonar (FLS) – Projects acoustic energy ahead of the platform to detect obstacles and map terrain in the direction of travel. Commonly used in submarines, AUVs, and ships for safe navigation in cluttered or unfamiliar environments.
- Depth Sounder / Echo Sounder – Measures the vertical distance between the vessel and the seafloor directly below. Widely used for basic navigation, under-keel clearance, and anchoring operations.
- Multibeam Echo Sounder (MBES) – Emits multiple acoustic beams across a wide swath perpendicular to the vessel’s path. It produces high-resolution bathymetric maps of the seafloor, making it indispensable for hydrographic surveying, terrain mapping, and advanced underwater navigation.
- Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) – Measures velocity relative to the seafloor using the Doppler shift of sonar pings, and is a critical component in inertial navigation systems (INS) for AUVs and ROVs operating without GPS.
- Diver Navigation Sonar – Handheld or mounted sonar units used by divers to navigate in zero visibility, locate structures, or follow terrain contours. Often includes FLS or imaging capabilities.
- Obstacle Avoidance Sonar – Detects objects protruding from the seafloor, suspended in the water column, or hanging from above (such as ice). Often integrated with FLS or mounted on autonomous platforms for real-time avoidance during transit.
ADVANTAGES:
- Obstacle Avoidance - Critical for preventing collisions, especially in low-visibility environments such as murky waters or ice-covered seas.
- Enhanced Situational Awareness - Provides a clear picture of the underwater surroundings, enabling informed navigation decisions.
- Real-Time Feedback - Allows immediate responses to potential hazards.
CHALLENGES:
- Environmental Noise - Natural and man-made noise can interfere with sonar performance, reducing accuracy.
- Resolution vs. Range Trade-Off - High-resolution sonar typically has limited range, which may require operators to balance between detail and coverage.
- Operational Constraints - Performance can be affected by factors such as water salinity, temperature, and pressure.
ADVANCEMENTS:
- High-Resolution Imaging - Advances in signal processing allow for detailed 3D imaging of underwater terrain.
- Autonomous Integration - Enhanced navigational sonar is being integrated into AUVs and ROVs for independent underwater operations.
- AI and Machine Learning - AI-driven sonar systems improve obstacle detection and terrain mapping in complex environments.
- Adaptive Waveforms - Optimized signals improve sonar performance in noisy or cluttered environments
▶︎ IMAGING
Underwater imaging sonar is a specialized type of active sonar technology designed to create detailed visual representations of objects, structures, and environments beneath the water's surface. Unlike traditional sonar systems focused on detection or navigation, imaging sonar emphasizes high-resolution rendering of underwater features, enabling users to "see" underwater in detail. It is widely used in defense operations, scientific research, and commercial development.
FEATURES:
- High Resolution - Imaging sonar systems use advanced signal processing to produce detailed pictures of underwater environments.
- Close-Range Accuracy - Optimized for short-to-medium ranges of 50 to 100 meters, where high detail is necessary for tasks like object identification and mapping.
- Versatility - Includes 2D, 3D, and even real-time video-like imaging in some advanced systems.
TYPES:
- Side-Scan Sonar (SSS) – Produces high-resolution, two-dimensional images of the seafloor by emitting fan-shaped acoustic pulses to both sides of a towed or hull-/vehicle-mounted system. Ideal for detecting seafloor features, objects, wrecks, and mines. Widely used in hydrography, archeology, and MCM.
- Multibeam Echo Sounder (MBES) – Emits multiple acoustic beams across a swath perpendicular to the vehicle’s path, capturing both bathymetric data and backscatter intensity. Provides 3D terrain mapping and limited imaging capabilities. Common in hydrographic surveys and seafloor characterization.
- Sub-Bottom Profiler (SBP) – Emits low-frequency sound pulses downward to penetrate sediment layers, producing cross-sectional images of the sub-seafloor. Used in geological surveys, cable route planning, and archaeology to detect buried objects or stratigraphy.
- Imaging/Scanning Sonar – High frequency, mechanically or electronically steered sonars designed for short-range, high-definition imaging. Commonly used for structure inspection, object recognition, navigation in turbid waters, and ROV/AUV operations.
- Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) – Achieves extremely high resolution by combining multiple pings along a precisely known trajectory, simulating a large aperture. Produces image quality comparable to optical systems. Used for mine countermeasures (MCM), surveillance, and scientific mapping.
- Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Sonar (InSAS) – A variation of synthetic aperture or multibeam sonar that uses phase differences between signals received on spatially separated receiver arrays to calculate precise seafloor elevation. InSAS combines the high-resolution imaging of synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) with interferometric techniques to generate detailed bathymetric (depth) data across a wide swath. It is particularly useful for shallow-water mapping, enabling high-accuracy 3D topography of the seafloor over large areas.
COMPONENTS:
▶︎ Transducer Array – Acts as both transmitter and receiver, emitting high-frequency acoustic pulses and detecting the returning echoes.
- Linear or 2D for beamforming,
- Typically >500 kHz to maximize resolution,
- Optimized for short to medium range performance.
▶︎ Signal Processing System – Converts raw echo data into usable images via:
- Beamforming to focus acoustic returns
- Image reconstruction (time-delay, synthetic aperture algorithms)
- Noise reduction and contrast enhancement
- AI/ML-enabled object detection or feature classification
▶︎ Display Interface – Presents processed sonar images in 2D or 3D formats via:
- Real-time, video-like imaging (ROV operations),
- High-resolution static frames (mine or wreck identification)
- Layered views (multibeam bathymetry plus backscatter)
APPLICATIONS:
Commercial
- Seafloor Mapping - High-resolution surveys for offshore construction, such as oil rigs or wind farms.
- Search and Recovery - Locating sunken vessels, aircraft, or lost cargo.
- Underwater Inspections - Inspecting pipelines, cables, and ship hulls.
Defense
- Mine Detection and Clearance - Identifying and classifying underwater mines with high precision.
- Submarine Detection - Detailed imaging for reconnaissance or surveillance.
- Subsea Inspection/Security - Monitoring critical underwater infrastructure, ports, and harbors.
Scientific Research
- Marine Biology - Studying underwater habitats and observing marine life in detail.
- Archeology - Locating and mapping submerged archaeological sites or shipwrecks.
Recreational
- Fishing - High-end imaging sonar is used by anglers to locate fish and underwater structures.
ADVANTAGES:
- High Detail - Produces clear, detailed images of underwater objects and environments.
- Versatile Deployment - Can be mounted on ships, submarines, ROVs, AUVs, or handheld by divers.
- Real-Time Feedback - Some systems provide live imaging, enabling immediate decision-making.
- Non-Intrusive - Uses sound waves rather than physical interaction to image the underwater environment.
LIMITATIONS:
- Limited Range- High-resolution systems often have a shorter effective range due to their reliance on high-frequency sound waves.
- Environmental Factors - Performance can be affected by water clarity, salinity, and temperature gradients.
- Cost - Advanced imaging sonar systems can be expensive, limiting their use to specialized applications.
- Data Complexity - Interpretation of sonar images requires expertise and advanced processing capabilities, as features may not be immediately recognizable.
ADVANCEMENTS:
- High-Frequency Systems - Newer systems use even higher frequencies for sharper resolution.
- AI and Machine Learning - Advances in machine learning are enabling sonar systems to automatically detect and classify objects, reducing operator workload and improving target recognition accuracy in cluttered environments.
- Autonomous Integration - Imaging sonar is increasingly used in AUVs and ROVs for autonomous underwater exploration.
- Real-Time 3D Imaging - Cutting-edge systems create immersive 3D visualizations of underwater environments in real time.
|OVERVIEW|SITREP|PRODUCTS|S&T|FEED|
SONAR MINIATURIZATION
In recent years, passive sonar has been miniaturized and integrated into autonomous platforms and distributed sensor networks, enabling persistent monitoring of the underwater domain. This trend is being driven by the miniaturization of uncrewed host platforms, advancements in electronics and underwater networked operations, and the desire to reduce onboard power consumption to improve platform endurance.
- Proliferation of Unmanned Systems: Smaller platforms (AUVs, and micro-AUVs) require compact, lightweight sensors that still deliver sufficient range and resolution.
- Swarm and Distributed Sensor Concepts: Operating many small sonar-equipped nodes is increasingly feasible and advantageous in both military and environmental monitoring contexts.
- Advancements in Materials and Electronics: MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems), nanomaterials, and integrated circuits enable smaller, more power-efficient acoustic systems.
- Low Power Demands: Smaller systems consume less energy, enabling longer-duration missions in energy-constrained AUVs.
▶︎ TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) SONAR
- MEMS-based transducers are being developed for miniaturized sonar arrays.
- These offer reduced size, weight, and power (SWaP) requirements, suitable for small AUVs or sensor networks.
- While not yet matching the range of traditional piezoelectric systems, MEMS are advancing quickly.
Piezoelectric and CMUT Miniaturization
- Development of miniaturized piezoelectric ceramics and capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) allows for more compact transmit/receive arrays.
- CMUTs offer potential for broadband performance in a small form factor.
Single-Chip Systems
- Integration of signal generation, amplification, filtering, and processing on a single chip or compact board reduces overall system size.
- Digital signal processors (DSPs) and FPGAs continue to shrink while becoming more capable.
Low-Frequency Miniaturized Sonars
- Advances in signal processing and transducer materials have enabled lower-frequency operation in smaller packages, enhancing range while maintaining form factor.
▶︎ EMERGING APPLICATIONS
- Micro-AUVs and Gliders: Miniature sonars allow even very small vehicles to conduct mapping, mine detection, and ASW roles.
- Swarm and Networked Systems: Numerous small sonar nodes can operate cooperatively, providing large-area coverage and resilience to detection or attack.
- Underwater Internet of Things (IoT): Sensor nodes with miniaturized acoustic modems and sonars are being explored for persistent monitoring of seabed infrastructure or habitats.
▶︎ LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES
- Reduced Power and Range: Smaller sonar systems generally suffer from lower source levels and reduced detection range.
- Beamforming Constraints: Miniaturized arrays may have limited aperture, reducing angular resolution and gain.
- Environmental Noise Susceptibility: Smaller systems can be more easily overwhelmed by ambient noise without sophisticated processing.
▶︎ OUTLOOK
SONAR miniaturization will likely continue to accelerate, aided by:
- Advances in nanofabrication and metamaterials.
- New array architectures (conformal or 3D-printed transducer arrays).
- Smarter onboard processing using AI/ML for adaptive detection, classification, and clutter rejection.
Potential Naval Applications:
- Low-cost, disposable sonar-equipped AUVs for one-way missions.
- Undersea sensor networks for persistent area denial or surveillance.
- Miniature towed arrays or hull-integrated systems on uncrewed platforms, like the Krait array, which had been integrated in to the Msubs prototype XL-AUV, Cetus (now Excalibur).
LOW-PROBABILITY-OF-INTERCEPT (LPI) SONAR
Low-Probability-of-Intercept (LPI) sonar refers to active sonar systems designed to minimize the likelihood of detection by adversary sensors. Unlike conventional active sonar, which emits high-intensity, easily identifiable pings, LPI systems use specially designed signals and emission strategies to reduce acoustic signature and make detection, classification, or localization by hostile forces significantly more difficult. LPI sonar seeks to combine the range and target resolution benefits of active sensing with the stealth advantages typically associated with passive sonar.
▶︎ KEY FEATURES AND TECHNIQUES:
-
Low Source Level Emissions – Transmits at lower intensity than traditional active sonar, reducing the distance over which the signal can be detected.
-
Spread Spectrum & Frequency Agility – Uses wideband signals or frequency modulation (chirp signals, coded pulses) that are difficult for adversaries to detect, distinguish from background noise, or match to known active sonar signatures.
-
Continuous Wave (CW) or Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) – Instead of discrete pulses, some LPI systems emit continuous, low-power acoustic signals that blend with the ambient soundscape.
-
Randomized or Aperiodic Transmission – Avoids predictable timing intervals between pings, making it harder for enemy systems to lock onto a pattern.
-
Signal Compression & Processing Gain – Advanced onboard processors extract useful echo information from weak return signals, enhancing range and resolution without increasing detectability.
-
Biomimicry - Emulating marine animal acoustic behaviors such as sperm whale clicks, dolphin echolocation, and even snapping shrimp bursts (see below for a more detailed discussion).
▶︎ APPLICATIONS:
-
Unmanned Systems – LPI sonar enables AUVs to navigate, avoid obstacles, or detect contacts while minimizing their own acoustic vulnerability.
-
Covert ASW Operations – Allows manned and unmanned platforms to actively search for submarines with reduced risk of counter-detection.
-
Minehunting and Seabed Mapping – LPI sonar can be used in littoral environments where stealth is a concern and active sonar clutter is high.
-
Swarm and Networked Sensors – Enables distributed nodes to maintain some active sensing capability without compromising the network’s position.
▶︎ ADVANTAGES:
-
Enhanced Stealth – Difficult for adversary systems to detect or identify transmissions, particularly in cluttered or noisy environments.
-
Operational Flexibility – Offers a middle ground between purely passive and fully active sonar, especially useful in contested environments.
-
Reduced Risk of Counterdetection – By avoiding detection, LPI sonar protects the transmitting platform from acoustic homing torpedoes or targeting.
▶︎ LIMITATIONS:
-
Reduced Detection Range – Lower source levels and signal power may result in shorter detection ranges, requiring trade-offs with mission requirements.
-
Processing Complexity – Requires sophisticated signal processing and waveform management to extract useful data from weak returns.
-
Limited Availability – LPI sonar systems are still relatively specialized and may not be available across all platforms or mission sets.
BIOMIMETIC LPI SONAR
Biomimetic sonar draws inspiration from marine animals that have evolved highly effective and stealthy acoustic sensing capabilities. By mimicking their signal structures, especially those of odontocetes (toothed whales like sperm whales and dolphins), engineers aim to develop active sonar systems that:
- Are naturally camouflaged within the marine acoustic environment,
- Possess advanced target discrimination capability,
- And exhibit low detectability by adversary sonar surveillance systems.
▶︎ KEY CONCEPTS:
Sperm Whale Clicks
Sperm whales produce high-intensity, broadband echolocation clicks with a unique pulse structure. These pulses:
- Have very short duration and high peak frequency,
- Are directionally focused (much like a sonar beam),
- And blend easily into background biological noise, making them hard to detect or localize using conventional sonar surveillance systems.
Dolphin Echolocation
Dolphins use short, frequency-modulated pulses (FM chirps) with incredible range resolution and target discrimination capabilities. Some LPI sonar research has focused on replicating:
- Dolphin-style broadband FM pulses for high-resolution imaging, and
- The non-repetitive and adaptive nature of dolphin clicks, which helps avoid detection and jamming.
Snapping Shrimp Noise Camouflage
Dense aggregations of snapping shrimp produce high ambient noise levels. This bio-acoustic clutter is being explored as a cover for covert sonar transmissions allowing a sonar system to hide within the environmental soundscape.
▶︎ ADVANTAGES:
-
Natural Acoustic Camouflage – Marine animal-like signals are harder to distinguish from biologics using standard signal processing or acoustic signature databases.
-
Directional and Broadband – Like marine mammals, biomimetic signals can combine high resolution and focused energy with low overall detectability.
-
Evasive & Adaptive – Biological echolocators constantly vary their pulse structure, timing, and directionality, traits that inspire LPI sonar systems to become more unpredictable and jam-resistant.
|OVERVIEW|SITREP|PRODUCTS|S&T|FEED|
|OVERVIEW|SITREP|PRODUCTS|S&T|FEED|
|OVERVIEW|SITREP|PRODUCTS|S&T|FEED|
|2024|2023|2022|2021|2020|2019|
2025
‣ New sonar tool is a ‘game changer’ for mapping the sea floor
(Science, 5/21/2025)
‣ Advancing seabed mapping: the power of the Sams 150 synthetic aperture mapping sonar and DriX USV
(Hydro International, 4/15/2025)
‣ Stealth Technology Breakthrough by Navy Researchers Could Revlutionize Underwater Drone Capabilities
(The Debrief, 3/21/2025)
‣ Northrop Grumman asked for upgrades of Side-scan sonar and digital signal processing for mine hunting
(Military& Aerospace Electronics, 2/27/2025)
‣ Surface-based sonar system could rapidly map the ocean floor at high resolution
(MIT News, 12/18/2024)
‣ Developments in Anti-Submarine Warfare & Underwater Situational Awareness
(European Security & Defence, 5/21/2024)
‣ Finding the edge: sonar technologies and programmes
(Eurpoean Security & Defence, 4/10/2024)
‣ General Atomics Tests Sonobuoy Dispensing System with MQ-9B
(Defense Post, 3/29/2024)
‣ Searching for Lost Submarines: An Overview of Forensic Underwater Technologies
(CIMSEC, 3/18/2024)
‣ Sonar Images Show A Submarine Playing Dead On The Sea Floor
(The War Zone, 10/25/2023)
‣ How Does Sonar Work? It Depends on Your Need for Stealth
(Popular Mechanics, 1/25/2023)
‣ Dolphin-inspired compact sonar for enhanced underwater acoustic imaging
(NUS News, 1/19/2023)
‣ Future focus on forward-looking sonar systems
(Superyacht News, 12/1/2022)
‣ Object recognition for side-scan sonar and video feeds
(Hydro International, 11/10/2022)
‣ Improve Sonar Searches by Acoustically Measuring Transmission Loss
(Proceedings, 10/2022)
‣ Automatic detection of seafloor pipelines with deep learning
(Hydro International, 3/8/2022)
‣ How Sonar Tech Is Solving Underwater Mysteries
(Discover, 1/14/2022)
2021
‣ A Roadmap to Successful Sonar AI
(CIMSEC, 8/19/2021)
2020
‣ Navy researchers to brief industry on mobile anti-submarine warfare (ASW) deep-water sonar next month
(Military & Aerospace Electronics, 2/26/2020)
‣ The Navy Wants A Rapidly Deployable Version Of Its Cold War Era Submarine Monitoring Network
(The War Zone, 2/21/2020)
2019
‣ Navy orders TB-29X towed-array sonar sensor systems to detect nuclear- and diesel-electric submarines
(Military & Aerospace Electronics, 3/26/2019)
‣ DARPA Wants to Turn Sea Life Into a Giant Submarine Detection Network
(Popular Mechanics, 3/5/2019)
